On many questions in the grantee survey, grantees are allowed to select “don’t know” or “not applicable” if they are not able to provide an alternative answer. In addition, some questions in the survey are only displayed to a select group of grantees for which that question is relevant based on a previous response.
As a result, there are some measures where only a subset of responses is included in the reported results. The table below shows the number of responses included on each of these measures. The total number of respondents to JSF’s grantee survey was 47.
Question Text | Count of Responses | |
---|---|---|
Overall, how would you rate the Foundation's impact on your field? | 43 | |
How well does the Foundation understand the field in which you work? | 44 | |
To what extent has the Foundation advanced the state of knowledge in your field? | 37 | |
To what extent has the Foundation affected public policy in your field? | 31 | |
Overall, how would you rate the Foundation's impact on your local community? | 42 | |
How well does the Foundation understand the local community in which you work? | 41 | |
How well does the Foundation understand the social, cultural, or socioeconomic factors that affect your work? | 46 | |
How much, if at all, did the Foundation improve your ability to sustain the work funded by this grant in the future? | 43 | |
How well does the Foundation understand your organization's strategy and goals? | 45 | |
How consistent was the information provided by different communication resources, both personal and written, that you used to learn about the Foundation? | 39 | |
Who most frequently initiated the contact you had with your program officer during this grant? | 47 | |
Did the Foundation conduct a site visit during the selection process or during the course of this grant? | 42 | |
Has your main contact at the Foundation changed in the past six months? | 44 | |
Did you submit a proposal to the Foundation for this grant? | 42 | |
As you developed your grant proposal, how much pressure did you feel to modify your organization's priorities in order to create a grant proposal that was likely to receive funding? | 27 | |
How involved was Foundation staff in the development of your grant proposal? | 27 | |
How much time elapsed from the submission of the grant proposal to clear commitment of funding? | 21 | |
Have you ever been declined funding from the Foundation? | 41 | |
Are you currently receiving funding from the Foundation? | 46 | |
Which of the following best describes the pattern of your organization's funding relationship with the Foundation? | 45 | |
How well does the Foundation understand your intended beneficiaries' needs? | 43 | |
To what extent do the Foundation's funding priorities reflect a deep understanding of your intended beneficiaries' needs? | 45 | |
Have you participated in a reporting or evaluation process? | 44 | |
To what extent was the Foundation's reporting process...Adaptable, if necessary, to fit your circumstances | 36 | |
To what extent was the Foundation's reporting process...A helpful opportunity for you to reflect and learn | 34 | |
To what extent was the Foundation's reporting process...Relevant, with questions and measures pertinent to the work funded by this grant | 36 | |
To what extent was the Foundation's reporting process...Straightforward | 37 | |
To what extent was the Foundation's reporting process...Aligned appropriately to the timing of your work | 37 | |
Did the Foundation provide financial support for the evaluation | 9 | |
To what extent did the evaluation...Result in you making changes to the work that was evaluated | 7 | |
To what extent did the evaluation...Incorporate your input in the design of the evaluation | 8 | |
To what extent did the evaluation...Generate information that you believe will be useful for other organizations | 8 |