Johnson Scholarship Foundation 2022 Grantee Perception Report - Public

Report Contents

Key Ratings Summary
Survey Population
- Subgroup Methodology and Differences
Comparative Cohorts
Grantmaking Characteristics
Impact on and Understanding of Grantees' Fields
- Advancing Knowledge and Public Policy
Impact on and Understanding of Grantees' Local Communities
Impact on and Understanding of Grantees' Organizations
- Grantee Challenges
- Non-Monetary Assistance
Funder-Grantee Relationships
- Interaction Patterns
- Communication
Contextual Understanding
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
Grant Processes
Dollar Return and Time Spent on Processes
- Time Spent on Selection Process
- Time Spent on Reporting and Evaluation Process
Customized Questions
- Customized Questions - By Subgroups
Grantees' Written Comments
Contextual Data
- Grantee Characteristics
- Funder Characteristics
Respondents and Communities Served
- Respondent Demographics
- Respondent Job Title
Additional Survey Information
About CEP and Contact Information

Suggestion Themes

Grantees were asked to provide any suggestions for how the Foundation could improve. The 43 grantees that responded to the survey provided 10 constructive suggestions. These suggestions were thematically categorized by CEP and grouped into the topics below.

Proportion of Grantee Suggestions by Topic

Topic of Suggestion	Proportion
Interaction with Grantees	60%
Grant Processes	20%
Grantmaking Characteristics	10%
Non-Monetary Assistance	10%

Next Previous