HELP

Use the left navigation pane or click "Next" or "Previous" to move between sections.

HELP

Search within and across reports.

HELP

Guide to interpreting charts.

HELP

Use the top right buttons to change the data displayed in your charts, download, and print your materials.

HELP

Have another question?

Reach out to your main contact at CEP

or call 617-492-0800.

Chart Options

Past Results
On
Off
PDF

Rogers Family Foundation 2014 Grantee Perception Report

Report Contents

  • GETTING STARTED
    • Video Tour
    • Print-Ready Report PDF
    • Grantee Comments PDF
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    • GPR Ratings Summary
    • Word Cloud
  • SURVEY POPULATION
  • COMPARATIVE COHORTS
  • GRANTMAKING CHARACTERISTICS
  • IMPACT ON AND UNDERSTANDING OF GRANTEES' FIELDS
    • Advancing Knowledge and Public Policy
  • IMPACT ON AND UNDERSTANDING OF GRANTEES' LOCAL COMMUNITIES
    • Understanding of Contextual Factors
  • IMPACT ON AND UNDERSTANDING OF GRANTEES' ORGANIZATIONS
    • Effect of Grant on Organization
  • FUNDER-GRANTEE RELATIONSHIPS
    • Quality of Interactions
    • Interaction Patterns
    • Contact Change and Site Visits
    • Foundation Communication
    • Communication Resources
    • Social Media
  • GRANT PROCESSES
    • Selection Process
    • Time Between Submission and Clear Commitment
    • Selection Process Activities
    • Reporting and Evaluation Process
    • Reporting and Evaluation Process Activities
  • DOLLAR RETURN AND TIME SPENT ON PROCESSES
    • Time Spent on Selection Process
    • Time Spent on Reporting and Evaluation Process
  • NON-MONETARY ASSISTANCE
    • Selected Comments
    • Management Assistance Activities
    • Field-Related Assistance Activities
    • Other Assistance Activities
  • GRANTEE SUGGESTIONS FOR THE FOUNDATION
    • Selected Comments
  • CONTEXTUAL DATA
    • Grantee Characteristics
    • Funder Characteristics
  • ADDITIONAL MEASURES
    • Funder Transparency
  • FUNDERS IN COMPARATIVE COHORTS
  • ABOUT CEP & CONTACT INFORMATION
    • About the GPR
    • Contact Information
Next Previous

IMPACT ON AND UNDERSTANDING OF GRANTEES' FIELDS

Compared to grantees at the typical funder, Rogers grantees have more positive perceptions of the Foundation's impact on their fields.

On other measures related to field impact:

Grantees rate the Foundation higher than typical for its:

  • Understanding of their fields
  • Advancement of knowledge in their fields
  • Impact on public policy

“Overall, how would you rate the Foundation’s impact on your field?”
  • 1 = No impact
  • 7 = Significant positive impact

HELP

“How well does the Foundation understand the field in which you work?"
  • 1 = Limited understanding of the field
  • 7 = Regarded as an expert in the field

HELP

Selected Grantee Comments:

  • "The Foundation clearly steps forward as a leader in developing best practices in the field, and supporting aligned funding and policy making."
     
  • "The Rogers Foundation is a key player on the local level in the field for which we are funded. They have a clear approach to the field and seek to leverage other funders and organizations with a similar approach and/or vantage point. They seek strategic partnerships to leverage larger outcomes."
     
  • "The Rogers Foundation is making it possible for Oakland schools to envision and implement blended learning programs; without their support, most of us would not be able to engage in this innovation to instruction."
     
  • "We are not a direct fit for the foundation so therefore they have limited impact on our field. We understand and respect the choices they have made."
     
  • "Especially through the Oakland Literacy Coalition and the Oakland Reads 2020 campaign, the Foundation is able to involve themselves deeply in the Oakland philanthropic and education community. We appreciate their efforts to coordinate the efforts of a large number of public and private agencies towards a common goal."

     
Next Previous
©2013, 2023, The Center for Effective Philanthropy